Political Factors Any corporation of a size of Dell is impacted by a set of political factors such as the level of political stability in the country, home market lobbying and international pressure groups.  It is important to note that to date there is no evidence of Dell being involved in a political issue, nevertheless, the company is not immune from detrimental impact of political factors in the future. Specifically, there is a risk for Dell and other US-based computing and technology companies to become unwelcome in certain markets, particularly in Russia and China due to spying concerns sparkled mainly after the revelations of whistleblower and former CIA employee Edward Snowden. Moreover, Dell might be impacted by activities of home market lobbying and pressure groups in emerging economies advocating the interests of local computer firms, thus creating barriers for Dell in forms of trade tariffs and other instruments.   Economic Factors Dell is directly impacted by a great range of economic factors that include currency exchange rates, interest rates, inflation rate, macroeconomic stability and costs of labor and raw materials. Particularly, currency exchange rate represents a major economic factor that affects Dell business performance directly and significantly because of the global scope of Dell operations. In order to address the negative impact of currency exchange rate and to gain operational efficiency, in February 2015 Dell became the biggest company that accepts bitcoins internationally[1]. Moreover, the global financial and economic crisis of 2007 – 2009 proved to have substantial detrimental impact on the growth of the global PC market, thus affecting Dell’s revenues. As it is illustrated in Figure 3 below, the growth in the global PC market amounted to 13% in 2007, however in 2009 the global PC market grew only 2% as a direct result of the crisis. It…


September 7, 2015
By John Dudovskiy
Category: PEST Analyses
Tags:

SWOT is an acronym for strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats related to organizations. The table below contains a brief illustration of Dell SWOT analysis: Strengths 1.      Charismatic and effective leadership by Michael Dell 2.      Market leadership in corporate usage. 3.      Leadership in cloud 4.      Leadership in healthcare sector Weaknesses 1.      Lack of patents for breakthrough innovations 2.      Long purchasing process 3.      Extensive dependency on suppliers 4.      Limited differentiation of products Opportunities 1.      Investment in research and development 2.      Engaging in mergers and acquisitions 3.      Increasing presence in tablet and smartphone market 4.      Concentrating in emerging markets Threats 1.      Data security 2.      Competition from emerging economies 3.      Economic crisis 4.      Decline of desktop and laptop market   Dell SWOT Analysis Strengths 1. The company’s founder and CEO Michael Dell is a respected business leader around the globe. Michael Dell’s reputation is not constrained within consumer electronics industry and he is the first UN Global Advocate for Entrepreneurship. Starting the business in 1984 at the age of 19 from his freshman dorm room in the University of Texas, Michael Dell has been the main driving force behind the rapid growth of the business. Michael Dell stepped down as CEO in 2004 and had to return to the role in 2007 due to the decline in financial growth and the overall customer satisfaction. Michel Dell’s return has been marked with the company regaining its leadership position in the market proving his value as one of the most important assets of the business. 2. Dell products and services are popular among organizational consumers from both, private and public sectors. Dell products are used by 98% of Fortune 500 Companies[1] and 90% of Fortune 1000 companies use Dell software. It has been estimated that around 10 million small business owners function with Dell globally[2]. By…


September 4, 2015
By John Dudovskiy
Category: SWOT Analyses

Value-chain analysis is an analytical framework that assists in identifying business activities that can create value and competitive advantage to the business. The Figure 1 below illustrates the essence of value chain analysis. It is important to note that the pattern of Dell value chain management has been extensively imitated by other companies, including companies outside of consumer technology industry due to its evident contribution to the success of the company. Figure 1 Value Chain Analysis Inbound logistics. Dell works with more than 165,000 channel partners in inbound logistics and provides USD 125 million partner incentives and investments annually[1]. The company utilizes Just-in-Time (JIT) philosophy in dealing with inbound logistics. Thanks to this strategy, Dell is able to save on huge inventory costs and sustain cost leadership for the majority of its products and services. Customer orders are registered by Dell and its vendors simultaneously by an integrated system. Then, materials are shipped by suppliers within 2 hours and shortly received at Dell’s assembly unit due to geographical proximity (see Figure 2 below). Operations. The main distinctive point between operations of Dell and its competitors relates to the fact that Dell is not a computer manufacturer; the company merely assembles parts manufactured by other companies. At the same time, high level of product customization is adapted as one of the bases of competitive advantage by the business. Therefore, operations mainly consist of three stages – assembly of stardard parts, installation of custom parts and testing product configurations (see Figure 2 below). Figure 2 Dell’s value chain[2] Outbound logistics consists of five stages as marked in red color in Figure 2 above. Thanks to the practice of mass customization, Dell is able to complete order fulfilment in a short duration of time. Generally, Dell completes customer shipments in a timely basis,…


September 3, 2015
By John Dudovskiy

Porter’s Five Forces analytical framework developed by Michael Porter (1979)[1] represents five individual forces that shape the overall extent of competition in the industry. These forces are represented  below: Threat of new entrants to consumer electronics industry is not significant due to cost and financial, knowledge and technological barriers. However, it is important to note that new businesses may overcome these barriers if they are able to introduce new products to the market based on innovative concepts. Large players such as Dell, Apple, HP, Samsung and Acer derive extensive benefits from the economies of scale and this fact represents an additional entry barrier to the consumer electronics industry. Bargaining power of buyers is immense due to the abundancy of offer and little differentiation amongst products. Moreover, there are usually no additional costs for Dell customers to switch to the competition and the majority of customers are well educated about products and services offered by Dell, another important factor that fuels buyer bargaining power. High level of price sensitivity for the type of products and services offered by Dell also increases the bargaining power of buyers. However, inability of backward integration, i.e. producing products offered by Dell by customers, can be specified as an important factor that diminishes buyer bargaining power. Bargaining power of suppliers is significant. Dell is extensively dependent on suppliers because it does not manufacture, but simply assembles its products from parts delivered by external vendors. Although there is a large number of companies that can potentially supply parts for Dell, there are only few reputable suppliers located close to Dell’s assembling units and this fact increases supplier bargaining power. Presence of supplier switching costs also contributes to their bargaining power. For Dell, the cost of supplies relative to selling price of products is high and it increases…


September 1, 2015
By John Dudovskiy

Dell Inc. is a global computer technology company that manufactures and sells PC, tablets, workstations and displays. Dell practices “Direct Business Model” that involves selling products directly to customers without intermediaries. Developed by founder and current CEO Michel Dell, this business strategy has proved to be highly effective in terms of gaining significant cost advantage in competition. Founded in 1984 in Texas, USA, Dell has emerged into one of the leaders in the global marketplace. Currently, the company employs 108,000 people globally and its portfolio comprises award winning products and services. Dell servers have been acknowledged as a product of the year in 2014 by CRN Test Centre and the company has been praised as a leader in Gartner’s Magic Quadrant for Modular Servers . Dell became a private company, as per shareholder agreement reached on September 12, 2013 and the company was acquired by its founder, Chairman and CEO Michael Dell in partnership with a global technology investment firm Silver Lake Partners. According to the agreement, Dell shareholders were provided USD 13.75 per common share and the company shares were delisted from NASDAQ Stock Market in October 29, 2013. There are evidences that after becoming a private company Dell’s current business strategy is associated with making a transition from PC assembler and seller to software developer, a strategy that proved to be successful with another global computer brand IBM. This report contains application of SWOT, PESTEL, Porter’s Five Forces and Value-Chain analytical frameworks towards the case study of Dell Inc. The report also comprises analysis of Dell’s marketing strategy and company’s approach towards Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). 1. Introduction 2. SWOT Analysis 2.1 Strengths 2.2 Weaknesses 2.3 Opportunities 2.4 Threats 3. PESTEL Analysis 3.1 Political Factors 3.2 Economic Factors 3.3 Social Factors 3.4 Technological Factors 3.5 Environmental Factors 3.6…


August 30, 2015
By John Dudovskiy
Tags:

Coca Cola releases Sustainability Report that comprises the details of CSR programs and initiatives engaged by the company. Coca Cola aims to give back at least 1% of its annual income for charitable causes annually. The figure below illustrates the pattern of distribution of this fund in 2013. According to the latest Coca Cola Sustainability Report for 2013/2014 the major CSR programs and engagements initiated by the company include the following: Categories of CSR activities Coca Cola Performance Educating and empowering workers During the period of 2012-2013 Coca Cola is mentioned in 26 lists, including the World’s 25 Best Multinational Workplaces 2013 compiled by the Great Place to Work® Institute. Labor and human rights Company’s EthicsLine channel provides stakeholders an opportunity to inform perceived violations of Code of Business Conduct, Workplace Rights or any other violations in a secure and anonymous manner.   In 2013, 44% of workforce in the US was multicultural and 1010 military veterans were hired during the year. Health and safety 100 out of 400 new beverage products introduced in 2013 are reduced-, low-, or no calorie. 94% of company-owned facilities comply with Coca Cola Workplace Rights Policy The rate of lost-time incident decreased in 2013, dropping to a low of 1.9 Environment a) energy consumption               b) water consumption     Energy efficiency improved by 20% compared to 2004   100 service vans in the US have been converted into efficient hybrid-electric vehicles Coca Cola has announced a program to reduce carbon footprint by 25% by 2020 Coca Cola has announced its commitment to balance its water usage by 2020. In 2013 the company has replenished an estimated 68% of the volume of its finished beverages and returned about 108.5 billion liters of water to communities and the nature.  …


August 25, 2015
By John Dudovskiy
Tags:

Value-chain analysis is an analytical framework that assists in identifying business activities that can create value and competitive advantage to the business. The figure below illustrates the essence of value chain analysis. Inbound logistics. Water is the main ingredient for all products manufactured by Coca Cola Company and the company occasionally faces significant challenges in accessing this particular raw material. Coca Cola uses high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) extensively and this raw material is purchased from US-based suppliers and delivered via trucks. There are also some ingredients that have to be sourced internationally. For example, orange juice and orange juice concentrate is sourced from Florida and Southern Hemisphere, particularly Brazil. For international purchases inbound logistics are facilitated via ships and trucks. Coca Cola values diversity among its suppliers. In 2013, $952 million were spent on diverse suppliers, an increase of 14.8% compared to the previous year. Operations. Coca-Cola operating segments are divided into the following 7 groups: Eurasia and Africa Europe Latin America North America Asia Pacific Bottling Investments Corporate The Coca Cola system is not a single entity from legal and managerial points of view. Coca Cola manufactures and sells concentrates, beverage bases and syrups to its bottling partners, maintains ownership of the brand and develops and applies marketing strategy. Bottling partners, entities that do not belong to Coca Cola, do manufacturing, packaging, merchandising and they distribute the final product to customers and vending partners. Outbound logistics. Coca Cola Company sells its products in more than 200 countries and understandably claims to operate the world’s largest beverage distribution system[1]. Distribution channels utilized by Coca-Cola consists of distribution operations operated or controlled by the company, independent bottling partners, distributors, wholesalers and retailers. The five major bottling partners listed in Table 3 accounted for 33% of the total unit case volume…


August 12, 2015
By John Dudovskiy

Porter’s Five Forces analytical framework developed by Michael Porter (1979)[1] represents five individual forces that shape the overall extent of competition in the industry. These forces are represented in figure below: Threat of new entrants in the industry is insignificant. This is because the global market of carbonated drinks is highly saturated and new entrants cannot benefits from the economies of scale extensively exploited by existing market players. Moreover, there is a substantial knowledge barrier in terms of being able to develop soft drinks that could successfully compete with industry leaders such as Coca Cola and Pepsi and the relevance of technological barrier can be assessed as substantial as well. Bargaining power of buyers is great and this power is fuelled by the availability of great choice of cola beverages. Moreover, there is no switching costs for customers and the price elasticity of products further increases buyer purchasing power. At the same time, the issue of Coca Cola addiction has surfaced in the media a number of times, addiction of Peter Lawrie, a professional golfer being a noteworthy exampe[2]. Accordingly, it can be argued that bargaining power of small segment of buyers who can be classified as ‘Coke addicts’ is not significant. Bargaining power of suppliers varies according to the type of supplier. There are few suppliers with great bargaining power such as Ajinomoto Co., Inc. and SinoSweet Co., Ltd suppliers of spartame, a non-nutritive sweetener and Nutrinova Nutrition Specialties & Food Ingredients GmbH, supplier of acesulfame potassium. Coca Cola operates Supplier Diversity Program that promotes diversity among suppliers for reportedly noble reasons, at the same time decreasing the bargaining power of each individual supplier. As it is illustrated in figure below, the volume of investment on supplier diversity has been consistently increasing for the last four years…. Coca Cola…


August 8, 2015
By John Dudovskiy

Effective marketing strategy has played a critical role for Coca Cola’s success in the global marketplace. The company has declared its total compliance with the following 4 principles of Responsible Marketing Policy: Choice – providing a great range of product options, so that customers can choose according to balanced diets and active lifestyles. Balance – encouraging the consumption of beverages in sensible manners and moderated amounts. Honesty – adhering to the principles of honesty and transparency in all marketing and sales activities. No marketing to children – marketing of any products should not be aimed at children under the age of 12. In addition to its own marketing initiatives, Coca Cola provides promotional and marketing services to distributors, bottlers and resellers on a discretionary basis. In 2014 marketing expenses of this category amounted to $7 billion respectively[1]. The company has announced ‘One Brand’ marketing campaign that is aimed to unite four different brands – Coca Cola, Diet Coke, Coca Cola Zero and Coca Cola Life under the umbrella of Coca Cola. The level of marketing spending to advertise lower sugar, no sugar and no calorie beverages has been doubled in 2015[2]. Advertising Coca Cola advertising strategy is boldly experiential with innovative design of posters and print and media advertising. The company is announced that media advertising investments will increase by $1 billion by 2016[3]. According to “One Brand” marketing campaign Coca Cola advertising via various channels will feature all four different brands of Coca Cola as illustrated in Figure 2 above. Viral marketing is accepted as an important element of the advertising mix by the company and it is extensively applied to promote specific marketing initiatives such as ‘Sharing a Can, personalization of Cola cans and bottles by printing names, as well as, “Sing For Me” campaign, an initiative that…


August 3, 2015
By John Dudovskiy
Category: Marketing
Tags:

Political Factors Coca Cola is impacted by a set of political factors, both, in the US and abroad. These include, but not limited to the level of political stability in the country, impact of international pressure groups and domestic market lobbying groups and the government attitude towards the industry and the company. There are few specific instances that illustrate the impact of political factors on Coca Cola performance. “One Day without Coca Cola” campaign launched by University organizations of the Social Nicaraguan Movement was a protest against the US-led invasion of Iraq with an inevitably negative impact on Coca Cola revenues in respective markets[1]. Similarly, Israeli attacks on Gaza in 2014 have caused some of the businesses in Turkey and more than 100 hotels in Mumbai stop selling products of Coca Cola Company[2].   Economic Factors Coca Cola sales are impacted by a set of economic factors that beyond of company’s control. These factors include the level of economic growth in the country and in the industry, tax rates and currency exchange rates, interest rates, labor costs and others. The global economic and financial crisis of 2007 – 2009 is a relevant example of an economic factor that greatly impacted the majority of businesses around the globe. However, the crisis has impacted Coca Cola to a lesser extent compared to many other businesses. Its operating margin remained at industry-front 22% despite the crisis, although dividend yield was reduced to 2.6%[3]. Arguably, fluctuations in exchange rate is the most significant economic factor that has adversely impacted Coca Cola performance in recent years. For example, due to severe currency devaluation in Venezuela, Coca Cola’s reported profits in this market has to be reduced by 55% in the fourth quarter of 2014 and there are similar instances in other parts of the world[4].…


July 30, 2015
By John Dudovskiy
Category: PEST Analyses
Tags:
[]